Flare Design Logo
twitter
email

  • Flare Design
  • Services
  • Clients



IVR Design Mistakes

June 14, 2013
by Richard
contact centre, customer experience, IVR, skills based routing, speech
0 Comment

How do IVRs end up so horrible?

The greatest challenge when designing an IVR is to ensure that it doesn’t get left to grow literally from requirements. The problem here is that requirements rarely, if ever, have business logic, complexity or priority locked into them. Developers and designers take them literally as a list of functions that must be delivered against.

Now the problem is exacerbated by the fact that the IVR only has a handful of “viewable” menus. To make everything “fit” into a series of prompt options the designer must start with an overgeneralisation of categories to the point where they are often indistinguishable from one another.

To explain, I’ll use banking as an example.

It seems sensible to have insurance as a menu option as that would seem to be clear and differentiate these calls from other banking enquiries. Great. But, these only represent fewer than 3% by volume of contacts. Even if we planned to send insurance to a banking CSR with the intention of transfer we would hardly affect the average rate of call t/f at all. For this call type the CSR would identify quickly that this is a transfer call and not waste time trying to diagnose the issue (something they do when the enquiry may carry similar terms to those calls they do handle). So why did we waste time putting this in the main menu? Because taken literally, and by hierarchy, it made sense.

What we have here is that the obvious and easy to a designer adds no value to the business. But the business aren’t working on the project now, it’s in the hands of the designer. Therein lies the issue.

What is needed is ongoing collaboration and challenge. To build an effective IVR each step (question/prompt to answer) needs to be challenged on “what would need to be different to avoid this question altogether?”. In almost all cases there is an answer, but it is the business that will be able to resolve this challenge, not the designer.

In a recent case study we had to deal with the complication of customer term about their “new card” being distinguished between a replacement and a new application. The prompting could have gone into the differences with the caller but what we did instead was swing the replacement card conversation into the team that looked after new applications. The enquiry was so easy to manage that it built call volume to a team that required high availability, and didn’t interfere with their primary work. Everyone was happy – and no questions required.

The solution – more upfront knowledge transfer, engagement of the people who can provide the business intellectual property, and the preparedness to work hard and find innovative solutions to the challenges and focus on delivering a better customer experience – ALWAYS.

About Flare Design: Flare are leaders in open speech customer experience and business process design. We bring a complete end-to-end view of the impacts, pitfalls and mitigating strategies of open speech implementations, change and the impact on staff. In the last 10 years, we have been fortunate to work on many of the major speech implementations and have contributed to the significant turn around in customer perception and press adoption of speech recognition systems.

 

 

Social Share
  • google-share

IVR News & Stuff

Customer Co-Creation
Mar 23, 2017
True Skills Routing
Nov 23, 2016
IVR Abandonment
Mar 07, 2016
Value Behind the Right IVR Persona
Feb 10, 2016
CX Coaching: One Year On Review
Jun 23, 2015

Search



Copyright © 2010 Flare Design All rights reserved